FST & FFC April meeting
#1
Notes from April meeting including Pre season games in Portugal

https://www.fulhamsupporterstrust.com/
news/2019/04/notes-from-april-meeting-with-ffc/
Part of the White Wall...
Reply }}
#2
LUCA MURPHY SIGNING

If you think about the transfer fees the club has paid; example on Mitroglou, played 6 games for us; we should cough up whatever Hartlepool want within reason. This just isn't Fulham.
Reply }}
#3
(25-04-2019, 02:37 PM)rebel Wrote: LUCA MURPHY SIGNING

If you think about the transfer fees the club has paid; example on Mitroglou, played 6 games for us; we should cough up whatever Hartlepool want within reason. This just isn't Fulham.

But they released him into the twilight zone; it would appear we did the player a favour by taking him in if he wasn't good enough for Hartlepool.
"there is not a lot of difference between doing well and doing bad" (M Jol, 29-Nov-2013)
"sometimes great trees grow from small seeds" (Kit Symons 18 April 2015)
“Claudio is risk-free and ready-made for the Premier League.” (S Khan 14 Nov 2018)
Reply }}
#4
(26-04-2019, 08:55 AM)Whiteforester Wrote:
(25-04-2019, 02:37 PM)rebel Wrote: LUCA MURPHY SIGNING

If you think about the transfer fees the club has paid; example on Mitroglou, played 6 games for us; we should cough up whatever Hartlepool want within reason. This just isn't Fulham.

But they released him into the twilight zone; it would appear we did the player a favour by taking him in if he wasn't good enough for Hartlepool.

Yes, that's what seems to of happened, but it seems that Hartlepool thinks that other influences has dictated the players behaviour; so he no longer merited consideration by Hartlepool. We know football can be 'dirty'; I'm siding with Hartlepool in this, just going by the way the club has done so many things this season. Just pay Hartlepool.
Reply }}
#5
(26-04-2019, 11:26 AM)rebel Wrote:
(26-04-2019, 08:55 AM)Whiteforester Wrote:
(25-04-2019, 02:37 PM)rebel Wrote: LUCA MURPHY SIGNING

If you think about the transfer fees the club has paid; example on Mitroglou, played 6 games for us; we should cough up whatever Hartlepool want within reason. This just isn't Fulham.

But they released him into the twilight zone; it would appear we did the player a favour by taking him in if he wasn't good enough for Hartlepool.

Yes, that's what seems to of happened, but it seems that Hartlepool thinks that other influences has dictated the players behaviour; so he no longer merited consideration by Hartlepool. We know football can be 'dirty'; I'm siding with Hartlepool in this, just going by the way the club has done so many things this season. Just pay Hartlepool.

It would not hurt Fulham to make a with no acceptance of fault payment to Hartlepool.
http://www.fulhamfc.com/news/

Gods and miracles only occur in fiction. 
Reply }}


Forum Jump: